Fresh Hell - The Astonishing Kind

We haven't had a good dose of Fresh Hell lately, thus, it should be rectified.

However, there are so many occasions of Fresh Hell cropping up around that one hardly knows where to turn, yet one believes one has found an especially egregious offender:

Vaccine sparks promiscuity fears
From: By Adam Cresswell
January 27, 2006
CALLS to make a world-first cervical cancer drug available to girls as young as nine have been criticised because of fears it would promote teenage promiscuity.

Trials of the vaccine, developed over 15 years by Australian of the Year Ian Frazer, showed it to be 100 per cent effective in protecting women against infection with four strains of human papilloma virus that together cause 70 per cent of cervical cancers.
But experts concede it raises sensitive issues because it cannot cure existing HPV infections and, for maximum effectiveness, it has to be given before women first become sexually active. As a result it is likely to be recommended for girls aged nine to 15.

The vaccine already has the backing of John Howard but Nationals senator Barnaby Joyce said MPs should be allowed to debate its "social implications".

Honouring Professor Frazer this week, the Prime Minister said he would discuss with federal Health Minister Tony Abbott making the vaccine, to be marketed under the brand name Gardasil, available to young women across Australia.

"We are looking at the implications of that and I expect to be talking to Mr Abbott about it quite soon," Mr Howard said.

The vaccine's maker, CSL, lodged an application last month to allow the sale of the vaccine in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The TGA will consider the issue in June.

If approved, it could be available privately in the second half of this year at an expected cost of up to $400 for a three-dose course.

An application for a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme subsidy would be likely shortly afterwards.

But Senator Joyce said the decision whether to approve the vaccine should not be left to the TGA because "they will talk about the therapeutic aspects - they are not there to talk about the psychological implications or the social implications".

"There might be an overwhelming (public) backlash from people saying, 'don't you dare put something out there that gives my 12-year-old daughter a licence to be promiscuous'," he said.

Senator Joyce - who has four daughters - said he would be "personally very circumspect" about giving such a vaccine to girls who were too young to cope with the potential consequences of sexual activity.

But others said young women should not be denied a life-saving vaccine.

Susan Robertson of Melbourne said she would not hesitate to give her three daughters the vaccine if it was shown to be safe.

"I don't see why parents would feel uneasy ... personally I would have absolutely no qualms protecting my daughters against anything that I could," she said.

Gerry Wain, director of gynaecological oncology at Sydney's Westmead Hospital - who also chairs CSL's advisory board on Gardasil - said statistics showed girls in Australia were now often sexually active at the age of 15 and parents were "putting their heads in the sand" to pretend otherwise.

"Sooner or later parents have to confront the fact their children will become sexually active ... no parent wants their children to die from cervical cancer," he said.

CSL's director of public affairs Rachel David said young children were already vaccinated against rubella - which can cause abnormalities in a developing fetus - "but we are not suggesting they will go and become pregnant".

"Vaccination is something we have adjusted to as a society - it's an important health measure," Dr David said


Read this article slowly and carefully, as the outcome is the possibility that a vaccine to prevent cancer linked to HPV (human papillomavirus, the cause of 70% of cervical cancers) may not be administered to those who are most in need of it, i.e. girls between the ages of 9 and 15, simply because of the intensely fuckwitted fear that a mere vaccination might somehow induce promiscuity.**

A good question that bears asking: who in their right mind as a parent of any girl of any age would simply consign her to the dustbin of mortality based on this? Why don't they just cut the crap and expose her directly to the mountains at birth?

It staggers the mind, it does.

Let us turn now to the reaction of Nature, for whom moral consideration, as we know but find it convenient to ignore, doesn't compute;

On which planet does a germ have a vested moral interest in anything other than its own survival and replication?

Last I heard we were living on a planet that doesn't host germs with moral values of any kind.

It's a known fact (discovered, coincidentally or not, without the benefit of moral values but through rigorous scientific inquiry) that HPV can kill; science nerdery, doing what it does best, has developed a vaccine to ensure that HPV doesn't kill.

In other words, if you are a girl who is vaccinated against this cancer, your future sex life won't result in you dying from HPV. This is not to say that other aspects of your future sex life won't find a way to strip you of life or dignity, but just not this one.

Progression. One bold step at a time. Hopefully forward.

**See also political caving in to fuckwitted fear, fact that this is happening in otherwise reasonable Australia, God help us all when the debate rages here in Heavy Duty Reynolds Wrap Christian Headquarters, DC